It is rare that such a striking example of a special interest vs. the public good comes before the Massachusetts Legislature (“Give low-income residents access to dental care,’’ Editorial, June 9). But that is what is happening, as the Massachusetts Dental Society opposes the use of dental hygiene practitioners to perform dental services for needy Massachusetts residents.

The case for mid-level practitioners has been won many times over in the medical field by nurse practitioners and physician assistants. The preventive and clinical services of dental hygiene practitioners are equally relevant, and they would relieve the suffering of thousands in underserved areas and at a lower cost.

The issue is clear: Who will the Legislature serve — the Massachusetts Dental Society or the public in need of dental services?

Herbert Belkin

Swampscott